love?

Media shapes what can be said, how it can be said, who can say it, who can receive those messages … Ultimately shaping how all of that knowledge that is created through those communications is stored and accessed … it can even shape how people experience the world. I'm really interested in how these media shape culture over time. - Mike Wesch

81,585 notes

ayothewuisback:

Upon cleaning out the darkest depths of my grandmother’s fridge, I discovered food that is older than me. This expired in February… 1987. This can saw Reaganomics. This can saw The Challenger explode. It saw the fall of the Soviet Union. It was around when Tupac got shot. Both times. This can is older than The Simpsons. #bruh

ayothewuisback:

Upon cleaning out the darkest depths of my grandmother’s fridge, I discovered food that is older than me. This expired in February… 1987. This can saw Reaganomics. This can saw The Challenger explode. It saw the fall of the Soviet Union. It was around when Tupac got shot. Both times. This can is older than The Simpsons. #bruh

(via noodlesinthevcr)

4,409 notes

The problem is I like you. I like you so much that it scares me because last time I opened myself up I got destroyed. I don’t think I can handle someone breaking me again.
I’m guarded now and I’m scared (via n4ughty-y)

(via ron-swansong)

Filed under yeah

248,858 notes

willowolven:

jakemalik:

this video is so important

literally me when I learned how to drive

(Source: pinkmanjesse, via hotel-de-la-bootiebutt)

Filed under tina is me i am tina

223,316 notes

acbranch:

I’m literally crying

(Source: vinegod, via englishistheartofbullshit)

Filed under hahaha hahahahahaha

12,167 notes

I asked my ex, now good friend, if she would ever have an open relationship and she said, “No, I don’t think I could do that” then after a pause and a smile, “but what about love affair friendships?” She went on to describe an impenetrable fortress of female friendship, her own group of best mates who’d known each other since school and had supported and loved each other through almost all of their lifetimes. They sounded far more bonded to, and in love with one another, than their respective husbands. It struck me that we don’t have the language to reflect the diversity and breadth of connections we experience. Why is sex the thing we tend to define a relationship by, when in fact it can be simple casual fun without a deep emotional transaction? Why do we say “just friends” when, for some of us, a friendship goes deeper? Can we define a new currency of commitment that celebrates and values this? Instead of having multiple confusing interpretations of the same word, could we have different words? What if we viewed our relationships as a pyramid structure with our primary partner at the top and a host of lovers, friends, spiritual soul mates, colleagues, and acquaintances beneath that?
Rosie Wilby, “You’re More Polyamorous Than You Think” (via foutue)

(Source: sodisarmingdarling, via englishistheartofbullshit)

Filed under words